![]() ![]() The chip has some interesting features such as a 35 bit digital volume control and a use of PWM in its processing. The M12 uses what was previously the Zetex ZXCZM800 chip, which was purchased by CSR CSRA6601, and is now part of Qualcomm. Of course, I’m know that the NAD M12 can be bettered by super gear at many times the price, but that doesn’t make it mid-fi. However, the NAD gear is significantly better to my ears in every regard, and far more revealing of details. To that point, while my Parasound Halo gear is certainly decent, we probably all agree it’s mid-fi. After break in, the NAD masters electronics are very revealing and quite musical. I fully understand that some may prefer a different sound offered by other topologies, but that’s preference, not an indication of fidelity level. Regarding the M12 - I have to disagree with one poster who stated that the NAD is mid-fi. And, for some music, the PS Audio is actually better from a musicality standpoint. While I think the NAD is better overall, it was about 2.5x the price. The sound quality is remarkable for the price. The PS audio stellar stack is an unbelievable value. And, if they’re not interested in that system, I think they could safely go w/ PS Audio as a company that does nice work and builds very good products. The OP is, I believe, interested in a different PS audio system than what I have, but I’d suggest they consider the Stellar system for the value and warranty. I have the PS Audio Stellar Pre/DAC in one system and the NAD M12 in another system and a Parasound Halo system in a 3rd system. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2023
Categories |